Technology risk and control assurance
Connect material technology exposures to business priorities, accountable owners and an explicit basis for risk acceptance.
What we do / Technology Risk & Resilience
Technology Risk & Resilience
Translate technology exposure into decisions leaders can act on. Connect resilience planning, control assurance and supplier dependencies to critical business services.
The executive question
Which dependencies could interrupt your critical services, and how will you demonstrate readiness?
Strategic choices and technical consequences belong in one accountability model.
ZECITI connects C-suite and supervisory-board priorities to architecture governance, delivery gates and implementation evidence. Scope is defined around the decisions that matter to the organization.
Scope & judgment
Technical depth.
Institutional accountability.
A mandate tailored to the organization’s operating context.
Digital resilience and business continuity
Map critical services to platforms, suppliers and recovery dependencies. Assess whether continuity assumptions can be demonstrated.
NIS2 readiness
Assess relevant organizational obligations with the client’s legal and compliance functions. Translate agreed requirements into control ownership and evidence.
DORA readiness where applicable
Where applicable, connect operational resilience requirements to ICT risk, third-party dependencies and reviewable implementation plans.
Technology third-party and supplier risk
Examine concentration, substitutability, access and exit dependencies. Assign treatment priorities and escalation routes.
Engagement evidence
A basis for review and acceptance.
Outputs, owners and acceptance criteria are agreed at the start of the engagement.
A critical-service and dependency view
A technology risk assessment with treatment owners
A resilience assurance plan and exercise priorities
The ZECITI operating model
One mandate.
Five connected disciplines.
Executive judgment. Technical depth. Accountable execution.
ADVISE
Clarify strategic choices, priorities and risk.
GOVERN
Establish accountability and decision rights.
ARCHITECT
Translate intent into coherent technical design.
DELIVER
Guide engineering and controlled implementation.
ASSURE
Review evidence, outcomes and residual risk.
Enterprise advisory
A critical transition.
A clear conversation.
Discuss the strategic context, the architecture decisions and the evidence needed for accountable implementation.
Discuss a Technology Risk Architecture ReviewConnected expertise
Explore how architecture decisions connect to security, delivery and assurance.
Perspective / Technology governance
Independent Design Authority: The Governance Layer Between Strategy and Technology Delivery
Critical technology transitions need more than an approved strategy. Independent Design Authority connects executive intent, architecture conditions and implementation evidence so consequential decisions remain accountable through delivery.
Perspective / Technology governance
Risk Exceptions: Decision Rights, Review Triggers and Implementation Evidence
An accepted exception must remain connected to the service, the controls and the assumptions that justified it. Define who decides, what must be demonstrated and when the decision returns for review.
Security advisory
PHP2Shell: make the response accountable
An urgent runtime fix needs clear ownership, a verified running build and evidence that the response is complete.